Heraldnet.com
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2008 3:47 am
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
RECENT POSTS:
Boeing to delay Dreamliner deliveries another six months – report  December 4

Boeing's too focused on short term, author says  December 4

Airbus critiques Boeing’s 787  December 3

SPEEA plans 'support actions' for Boeing negotiations in Kansas  December 3

Airline merger news and 'non-passenger' fees  December 2

Archives:
LINKS:

Airbus
Airbus
EADS
Orders and Deliveries

Analysts
Richard Aboulafia
Scott Hamilton

Blogroll
FleetBuzz
IAG Blog
Randy Tinseth's blog

Flight museum
Future of Flight
Museum of Flight

Labor Group
International Association of Machinists
Local 751 Machinists
SPEEA

Tanker competition
Air Force
Boeing's KC-767 tanker
Boeing's tanker blog
Government Accountability Office
Northrop's America's New Tanker
Northrop-EADS' KC-30

The Boeing Co.
Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Employment
New Airplane
Orders and Deliveries
RELATED ARTICLES:
Strike, glitches still haunt Boeing  December 5
Online sales grew Monday by 15 percent  December 4
Merger won't keep Lumera on Nasdaq listing  December 3
SPEEA workers OK Boeing's contract offer  December 2
SPEEA to vote today on Boeing contract  December 1
China to delay airliner purchases  November 29
China’s first homegrown airliner makes trial flight  November 28
Faulty part bogs down Boeing's jet lines   November 26
Navy planes could come to Whidbey  November 24
Boeing plant remains shut down after possible sabotage  November 22
Interactive
Special report
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Aerospace Blog


 
 

Boeing Machinists: We're fighting for the middle class


Posted at 3:15 pm by Michelle Dunlop

Leaders for the Boeing Machinists union today posted a lengthy explanation about why contract talks broke down with the company this week.

Based on the length and voracity of the message, I’m betting the union got a lot of phone calls/e-mails over the breakdown in talks.

The union and Boeing failed Monday to reach an agreement after renewing talks for the first time in more than a month. At that point, the union said Boeing wanted to eliminate 2,000 Machinists positions – mostly in materials and inventory handling.


Yesterday, Boeing swung back at the union saying the company wants to make process improvements by introducing new technologies. The company had said it wouldn’t get rid of those 2,000 jobs through next three years of a contract. But Boeing stressed that it needs to improve productivity to remain competitive.

Here’s an excerpt from the union’s message today:

This is not just about these 2,000 or so jobs. If Boeing replaces these jobs inside the factory, the chances are even greater that they will chip away until they have replaced all our jobs with vendors. Vendors will want to install the interiors they deliver. The landing gear suppliers will want to do their own installation. Vendors will want to hang the engines. Where would it stop? We have had facilities subcontractors inside the Boeing gates for their entire career. This is wrong, and the time to stop vendors from expanding their scope inside the Boeing gates is now. This is not just about parts handlers, but all our jobs. It is union busting - plain and simple. …

Also keep in mind the 787 is seriously behind schedule due to mismanagement and a flawed strategy of outsourcing to subcontractors around the world who could not deliver on time, with properly manufactured and engineered parts -- something current Boeing employees, our members, have always delivered. This loss of control of the final product caused the delays and is a "direct result" of management decisions -- not the IAM workforce. …

This fight is not just for the benefit of the union workers of the Boeing Company. It is a fight for the middle class and maintaining this middle class for years to come.
READER COMMENTS
Click here to see all Aerospace Blog comments
Log in or register to post new commentLog out
(No heading)
Sorry if you misunderstood that Mr. Phillips...and you obviously misunderstand my position on the strike. I am a striking machinist and one of those "dead weight" employees...

I was not analogising the dead weight from our perspective, but the company's...that's what they feel we are- when they decide to outsource, they decide the employees holding those positions are "dead weight"...but because of the ridiculous way our union negotiates, they have allowed the company the latitude to promise they won't "layoff" those employees directly from the affected jobs...
However, they are able to shift them to other positions, other shops and then, using the seniority rules, are able to lay people off.

If you read most of my comments, you will see that I am damn mad that this country continues to see decent paying jobs as a burden to corporate America! I am sick of hearing how we are greedy and pampered! Our communities will suffer the longer we are on the lines and they will suffer when the company is able to shed jobs and subcontract down to minimum wage positions! How can people pay their rents on minimum wage or buy a house and support the tax base and support businesses in their community, while the company is able to continue realizing tax benefits, tax shelters and massive profits, off our backs! Further, as the company sub-contracts out these jobs, they are also not required to ensure they are utilizing legal labor! Our government fails to require proper identification by business and industry and it's why they are able to feign ignorance when a sub-contractor in Dallas uses illegals to work skin panels or illegals in South Carolina to manufacture parts! It's all part and parcel to ringing the death knell for manufacturing and you should be glad people like me keep opening my fat trap and yelling about it!

CC At the Big B | Oct 19, 2008 5:24 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
(No heading)
CC at the big B. Where do you ******* calling Material handlers at Boeing, "Dead Weight" ?
I have read a lot of negative comments from you on almost every Boeing story related to the strike. You see how how fast the inventory and second issue parts get screwed up once you have "New Breed" handling all our materials. I don't know what job you have at Boeing. But if it's a salaried job, you can bet you have a lot more "Dead Weight" employees than the IAM membership has.

Grant Phillips | Oct 17, 2008 1:00 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
(No heading)
I have to agree w/ most of what is said here. The company has a history of shifting "dead weight" employees to other areas then laying them off.

And yes, this is about protecting not only our way of life, but our own competitive edge. The amount of technology that has simply walked out the door will kill the company in the end and another industry in this country.

It cannot always be about the "cheapest"...look where it's gotten us to this point.

CC At the Big B | Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
  Return to Aerospace Blog
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT