Heraldnet.com
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2008 5:56 pm
ADVERTISEMENT

LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
The Buzz
The Legos are with you always
Your town news
Julie Muhlstein
Columnist Julie Muhlstein's take on life in Snohomish County.
•Latest: Is teen cheating, shoplifting on the rise?
Kristi O'Harran
Columnist Kristi O'Harran writes about people in Snohomish County.
•Latest: Father, daughter: 2 types of heroes
Latest gallery

Turkey Kids
November 26. 2008 (19 photos)
[More Herald photos]
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Wednesday


Marysville tries to decide fate of high school
Transit use stays high as gas prices fall
Father, daughter: 2 types of heroes
Tuesday


SPEEA workers OK Boeing's contract offer
Keystone run to get new ferry by 2010
At a stalemate, lawmakers put off decision on s...
Monday


Crops attract snow geese; hunts control field-d...
County budget cuts hit courts, will affect cities
Man sold Lowe's gift cards from stolen goods, p...
Sunday


Fighting foreclosure: How one couple got caught...
Monroe man's family remembers a life devoted to...
155-year boys club comes to an end
Saturday
How to avoid holiday thieves
Burn ban orders will have new teeth
Get a flu shot now, officials urge
Friday


A community in limbo
Ideas arise on housing sex offenders
Turnout for historic election breaks county and...
Thursday


Ways to Give: Where you can make a difference
Ways to give: Charities hit hard from both sides
County Council cuts deeply from most staff exce...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Local News   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

Jennifer Buchanan / The Herald  (click to enlarge)
Judge George Bowden smiles as one of four drug court graduates receives his diploma Monday night in Everett.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Robert Frank, City Editor
frank@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Drug court left in limbo

Mikel Kowalcyk was caught two years ago with cocaine. The 37-year-old had been doing drugs for more than two decades, but it was the first time she'd been arrested.

When she appeared in court, she said, a judge offered her two choices: Spend 20 days in jail or a year or more participating in drug court, an intensive drug rehabilitation program.

Kowalcyk chose drug court.

"I wanted to stop using," she said.

Kowalcyk graduated from drug court in July -- clean for the first time in her adult life.

If she'd been arrested today, she would have had no choice but jail. She would have served her time, and believes she probably would have returned to drugs when she was released.

Snohomish County drug court officials stopped accepting participants early this month because they're not sure the program will still be around come January, when a new county budget cycle begins.

County leaders say all government programs, services and jobs could be cut by up to 9 percent to balance a budget that has seen revenues mauled by the ailing economy. The five-member County Council hasn't said exactly which programs might go, but drug court officials say they are worried because the program is not mandated by law.

"At 2.5 percent cut, maybe we could scale back," said Snohomish County Superior Court Judge George Bowden, who presides over drug court. "But at 5 percent or more, we'd have to cut drug court."

The council asked Superior Court to suggest cuts totaling up to $2 million from the court's $26.3 million budget, according to a memo sent Monday from court administrator Bob Terwilliger to court officials.

Terwilliger told Bowden and other judges that they shouldn't assume nonmandatory programs such as drug court will be funded after January.

"We are committed to trying to maintain the drug courts, but can only do so if funding is available," Terwilliger said.

The state covers some of drug court's costs, but not enough to continue running the full program, Bowden said.

Drug court serves about 150 people at any given time, Bowden said. More than 360 people have graduated from the 12-month program since it began with federal seed money in 1999. The program cost the county about $475,000 last year. County Executive Aaron Reardon recommended in his budget proposal that drug court funding increase to about $505,000 in 2009.

The council threw out Reardon's budget proposal last month after many of the county's elected leaders complained that they weren't included in budget talks. Reardon has asked the council to continue funding drug court, said Christopher Schwarzen, Reardon's spokesman.

The council has asked every department to submit separate budget proposals with cuts of 7 percent and 9 percent, said councilman Dave Gossett, chairman of the law and justice committee. Revenue predictions seem to be worsening by the day, he said, and even if the economy turns around quickly, it won't be fast enough to save the county's 2009 budget from a big hit, he said.

The council probably will come up with a dollar amount that must be trimmed, and ask each department head to decide where cuts should be made, he said.

"Drug court is an extremely valuable program and I would prefer not to see it cut," Gossett said. "But they understand their budget better than I do. All I can do is tell them how much money there is."

Drug court costs Snohomish County taxpayers about $7,700 per person for 18 months in the program. It's designed to take just one year, but most participants stick around for an extra six months to be sure they've really kicked the bad habits and formed new, good ones, Bowden said.

Time in the county jail costs about $80 per day, or about $29,000 per year, Bowden said. State prison costs about $27,000 per year.

Many criminals who enter drug court are repeat offenders facing several years in prison, he said. Taxpayers spend tens of thousands of dollars to keep them there, but when they're released they often return to the same bad behavior, Bowden said. Cars are stolen, homes are burglarized, bank accounts are hacked. Before long, the criminals often wind up right back in court and then in prison, where taxpayers must foot the bill yet again, Bowden said.

Drug courts nationwide are much more successful at reforming criminals than standard prison time, Bowden said, and Snohomish County's program is among the best. So far, 7 percent of all local drug graduates wound up back in trouble, compared with up to 70 percent in other rehab programs, Bowden said.

The stories of drug court graduates show other ways the program saves money. Bowden knows of mothers who have regained custody of children who previously were in state-funded foster care. People who were on welfare while they were addicts have found jobs and become self-sufficient.

The problem is that the county government doesn't realize those savings, Bowden said. Using drug court to keep a person out of prison saves the state $29,000 a year, Bowden said. That's equivalent to the annual wages of somebody working full-time at a job paying nearly $14 an hour.

Kowalcyk, the drug court graduate, said she would still be spiraling down in addiction were it not for the court's program. As vice president of the Snohomish County Drug Court Alumni Association, she encourages other graduates to speak out in favor of the program she believes saved her life.

For years, she said, she did little to benefit society.

"Now I'm a full-time student with a job," she said.



Reporter Krista J. Kapralos: 425-339-3422 or kkapralos@heraldnet.com.

READER COMMENTS
Log in or register to post new commentLog out
Drug Courts and Truancy Court are separate programs
We have been extremely distressed to hear about the potential effect of the County budget on drug court programs. Along with the adult offender drug court referred to in this article, Juvenile Court has three other drug courts: Juvenile offender drug court, juvenile at-risk youth drug court (both of which have been very successful for a number of years), and family treatment drug court, which just began early this year, after several years of planning. The elimination of any of the drug court programs would be harmful not only to the participants, but ultimately to the community as well.

However, the Juvenile Court truancy program has nothing to do with drug court. The current truancy system in Juvenile Court was enacted by the state legislature as part of the "Becca Bill." As attorneys, our role is to advocate for children who are subject to contempt hearings and potential incarceration in juvenile detention as a result of excessive school absences. Juveniles who are confined as a result of truancy proceedings are held in the same facilities as juveniles who are accused of criminal offenses. The law guarantees certain protections to persons, including juveniles, who are in jeopardy of court-ordered confinement. Without attorneys, these children would have no representation in court and no one to protect their due process and constitutional rights.

We would prefer that all children go to school. Part of our job is to encourage them to attend school, so that they can get an education, improve their lives and future prospects, and get themselves out of the truancy court process. We would much rather see kids in school than in court. But when they are called into court, we are there to try to help them.

Kristin Timm
Ann Brice

Kristin Timm | Oct 14, 2008 4:10 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Online schools as a part of drug court
Enroll drug offenders in online public school while they attend drug court. It is the best chance they have to stay focused on improving their lives. Too often students drop out and drug up because they were bored in school. Online schools allow students to work at their optimum pace, take classes that interest them, and saves taxpayers about $2000 per student.
Randy Dutton | Oct 14, 2008 1:35 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Drug Court
It would be a shame if the County fails to fund the Drug Court. It is helping so many people turn things around.

If the County wishes to make cuts, I'd suggest they discontinue the services of the law firm (Brice and Timm)which is getting paid $200,000.00 a year of taxpayer monies for Truancy Court. The attorneys are enabling students to not attend school and are doing all they can to prevent kids completing their education. Everyone is aware that truancy and lack of education often leads to criminal behaviors including drug abuse, teen pregnancy, jail, and sometimes death.

I believe the County would serve us citizens better by keeping Drug Court in place and by getting rid of the law offices of Brice and Timm in Denney Youth's Truancy Court. Not renewing the contract for Brice and Timm will act as a deterrent in keeping kids out of jail and away from drugs.

Kristine Jones | Oct 14, 2008 1:02 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal

1. Waitress tied up during Marysville robbery
2. Man sentenced in brother's slaying
3. Marysville tries to decide fate of high school
4. Father, daughter: 2 types of heroes
5. Fire destroys Monroe triplex, leaves families without homes
6. Snohomish County raises sales tax to pay for drug treatment
7. Transit use stays high as gas prices fall
8. Rockin' at holiday tree auction
9. Is teen cheating, shoplifting on the rise?
10. Abandoned school bus destroyed by fire
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Saved by a helmet
King's girls beat Bellevue Christian in opener
Wildcats tumble in state semifinals
Returning trio boosts Hawks' playoff hopes
Deficits loom for senior program
Edmonds to delay most drastic cuts
Neighborhood, inc.
City readies for 'green' road
Timberwolves look to build on success
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT