Heraldnet.com
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2010 2:14 pm
ADVERTISEMENT

LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
Midday Snacks
I'd like to have a few "Words" with you
Your town news
Julie Muhlstein
Columnist Julie Muhlstein's take on life in Snohomish County.
•Latest: Recycling food waste is no big deal
Latest gallery

Everett Manhunt
September 1. 2010 (9 photos)
[More Herald photos]
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Wednesday


A stroke of kindness for Everett woman
Suspect arrested in Everett manhunt after shots...
New student exams, familiar results
Tuesday


Crash leaves car embedded in Everett Transit bus
County students get mixed grade from superinten...
Stevens Hospital District taxes to stay
Monday


More than a nuisance
Mukilteo's red-light camera fight on radar of ...
Renamed Keystone ferry terminal a coup for Coup...
Sunday


Snohomish County becomes a destination for airp...
You’ll need only 1 flu shot this year
Snohomish County YMCA goal: Healthy kids
Saturday


Marysville's new school getting ready for its f...
When the circus came to Everett ... in 1910
Drop in ferry ridership leveling off
Friday


New flight simulator re-creates 787 for pilots
Berkey calls for investigation into campaign ag...
Crash flips horse trailer on I-5, blocking traffic
Thursday


Heroin increasing its reach in small towns
Everett schools gain; Berkey's deficit widens
Rabbits and chickens move in as Evergreen fair ...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Local News   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Robert Frank, City Editor
frank@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Monday, June 30, 2008

Burn ban should ease air pollution

Developers in Snohomish, King and Pierce counties can't burn trees and brush to clear land slated for development.

Starting this week, and forever after, expect less of a haze floating over Snohomish County.

In an effort to keep smoke from polluting the air, a permanent ban goes into effect Tuesday on burning piles of trees and brush to make room for housing projects in rural Snohomish, King and Pierce counties.

The ban was approved in February by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency board, which has authority over pollution standards in the region.

Developers didn't rise up against the agency's order to stop setting fire to trees and brush, said Snohomish County Councilman Mike Cooper, a member of the clean air board.

"Early on in this process, a lot of developers agreed to this ban," Cooper said. "All of the data showed that banning outdoor burning of this type significantly reduces our carbon going into the air and improves our air quality."

The new rule comes on top of an existing ban on outdoor burning in urban parts of the three largest Puget Sound counties. The region often comes close to violating federal pollution standards during hot summer days.

Snohomish County produces an estimated 760 tons of fine smoke particulates each year from fires related to land clearing, agency spokesman Mike Schultz said. That's more than twice the amount of fine particulates pumped out by all Snohomish County cars and vehicles, Schultz said.

More detailed figures were not immediately available Friday.

In the summertime, 40 percent of all air pollution is from outdoor fires in the Puget Sound counties, and 43 percent comes from trains, planes and vehicles, Schultz said.

The development community has reconciled itself to obeying the new law, said Mike Pattison of the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties.

"It's the law and we'll live with it," Pattison said. "Maybe we could have done a better job expressing our opposition."

He said he wished the clean air agency would have provided the developers with equipment to help grind up and dispose of the trees and brush they'll clear in rural areas.

State law requires the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency expand the burn ban boundaries as yard waste recycling becomes more available and affordable.

The agency's board stopped short of a proposed all-out ban in the three counties that would have looped in all yard waste burning by rural property owners -- not just for development projects, Schultz said.

"It isn't economically feasible to chip, grind or haul substantial quantities of waste that's blown down or pruned on an annual basis," Schultz said. "The volume of this stuff is greater than we thought."

A permanent ban on burning residential yard waste is expected to be up for debate again in the fall, Cooper said.



Reporter Jeff Switzer: 425-339-3452 or jswitzer@heraldnet.com.

Other Advertisers
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes

ADVERTISEMENT