Heraldnet.com
SATURDAY, JULY 19, 2008 3:36 am
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
RECENT POSTS:
Tanker talk: What's in a name? To Northrop, perhaps a lot   July 17

Tanker update: European leaders look to Bush for help  July 17

Machinists to Boeing: 'Nobody gets left behind'  July 17

Airbus bags $40 billion in orders at air show  July 17

Air China to order 45 Boeing jets  July 15

Archives:
LINKS:

Airbus
Airbus
EADS
Orders and Deliveries

Analysts
Richard Aboulafia
Scott Hamilton

Blogroll
FleetBuzz
IAG Blog
Randy Tinseth's blog

Flight museum
Future of Flight
Museum of Flight

Labor Group
International Association of Machinists
Local 751 Machinists
RELATED ARTICLES:
Airbus dominates Boeing at Farnborough air show  July 18
Breakthroughs led to airliner fuel-tank safety device  July 17
Boeing Machinists say they're willing to strike  July 17
Lynnwood OKs fiber-optic TV from Verizon  July 17
FAA orders retrofits of airliner fuel tanks  July 17
New rules for Boeing, Airbus airliner fuel tanks  July 16
Boeing trails Airbus in jet orders at air show  July 16
Boeing still bullish on its tanker bid  July 15
Boeing splits new orders with Airbus  July 15
Business Briefly: Telemetry problems mar 777 flight  July 15
Interactive
Special report
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Aerospace Blog


 
 

Boeing labels Northrop anti-U.S. in trade dispute


Posted at 3:56 pm by Michelle Dunlop

Boeing upped its rhetoric today in a lengthy public battle with Northrop Grumman and EADS over a $35 billion tanker contract.

The Air Force awarded the contract to Northrop and EADS in February. Boeing has protested the deal with the GAO.

On Thursday, the Chicago-based Boeing painted Northrop as anti-American in a new post on Boeing’s tanker blog. Boeing said that Northrop has sided with the European Union and Airbus over the United States and Boeing in a dispute in front of the World Trade Organization.

Northrop’s partner for the tanker, EADS, is the parent company of Boeing’s commercial rival Airbus. Airbus’s A330, which serves as the basis for the Northrop tanker, is one of the jets listed in Boeing’s WTO dispute.

Boeing says Northrop is trying to give the impression that the WTO dispute is “much ado about nothing.” Boeing calls Northrop’s actions a “slap” at the U.S. Trade Representative.

Does Boeing's latest accusation take things a bit too far? Or should does Northrop's actions deserve the anti-American label?
READER COMMENTS
Click here to see all Aerospace Blog comments
Log in or register to post new commentLog out
a bit to far???
They took the whole farce a lot to far when they started attacking NG and the USAF.
You claim you lost a competition unfairly - So you make an appeal before the GAO. They'll determine wheter or not illigal activity influanced this competions outcome.

Why try to browbeat the US public into your camp, telling untruths and outright lies. The truth will come out - wheter it's on your side or not. If you really think you're right, then why is all this bullying nescecary??

Ikke Man | May 16, 2008 1:56 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
  Return to Aerospace Blog
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT