Heraldnet.com
FRIDAY, JULY 18, 2008 9:01 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
RECENT POSTS:
Tanker talk: What's in a name? To Northrop, perhaps a lot   July 17

Tanker update: European leaders look to Bush for help  July 17

Machinists to Boeing: 'Nobody gets left behind'  July 17

Airbus bags $40 billion in orders at air show  July 17

Air China to order 45 Boeing jets  July 15

Archives:
LINKS:

Airbus
Airbus
EADS
Orders and Deliveries

Analysts
Richard Aboulafia
Scott Hamilton

Blogroll
FleetBuzz
IAG Blog
Randy Tinseth's blog

Flight museum
Future of Flight
Museum of Flight

Labor Group
International Association of Machinists
Local 751 Machinists
RELATED ARTICLES:
Airbus dominates Boeing at Farnborough air show  July 18
Breakthroughs led to airliner fuel-tank safety device  July 17
Boeing Machinists say they're willing to strike  July 17
Lynnwood OKs fiber-optic TV from Verizon  July 17
FAA orders retrofits of airliner fuel tanks  July 17
New rules for Boeing, Airbus airliner fuel tanks  July 16
Boeing trails Airbus in jet orders at air show  July 16
Boeing still bullish on its tanker bid  July 15
Boeing splits new orders with Airbus  July 15
Business Briefly: Telemetry problems mar 777 flight  July 15
Interactive
Special report
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Aerospace Blog


 
 

Senators question Northrop/EADS tanker job stats


Posted at 2:23 pm by Michelle Dunlop

Sens. Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray have asked the U.S. secretaries of commerce and labor to review job projections given by Northrop Grumman and EADS for their tanker bid.

In their original pitch to supply the U.S. Air Force with aerial refueling tankers, Northrop and EADS said their KC-30 tanker would create about 25,000 jobs in this country. Northrop and EADS revised that figure to 48,000 after the Air Force picked the KC-30 over the Boeing Co.’s KC-767.

From the senators’ letter:

As we understand it, NG/EADS will not be under any contractual obligation to create jobs across the United States, and we are trying to determine if they are overestimating job projections. In the past, EADS subsidiary Airbus Industrie (Airbus) has exaggerated U.S. job creation claims. In 2003, Airbus asserted that commercial work on its planes had created 100,000 U.S. jobs. In response to a request from Senator Murray, the United States Department of Commerce investigated and could not verify the job creation claims because Airbus calculations were “based on imprecise terms.”

The aerospace industry is critical to our national and economic security. In 2006, in recognition of the unique and ongoing workforce challenges facing the U.S. aerospace industry, Congress established the Interagency Aerospace Revitalization Task Force. In January 2008, the Task Force reported that in order to effectively grow our aerospace industry we must create jobs for skilled engineers, technicians, machinists, tool and die makers, and technical writers.

NG/EADS has stated a tanker assembly plant will be located in Mobile, Alabama. Its business model suggests high skill jobs will be created and maintained in Europe and other foreign countries. Given the vital importance of the aerospace industry to U.S. interests, it is essential to substantiate the number and quality of the NG/EADS U.S. job claims. It is also imperative for Congress to have this information to make informed decisions about the tanker program. For these reasons, we ask you to verify the NG/EADS job claims and provide an estimate of the true employment impact of the KC-45 Aerial Refueling Tanker Program.
READER COMMENTS
Click here to see all Aerospace Blog comments
Log in or register to post new commentLog out
equal treatment?
Why not also check boeing's claims? Make an actual comparison of the number of US jobs both competitors would generate for this contract...
Ikke Man | May 9, 2008 4:03 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
  Return to Aerospace Blog
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT